Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Clinical Proteomics

Fig. 4

From: Elevated level of multibranched complex glycan reveals an allergic tolerance status

Fig. 4

Relative abundance of different derived glycosylation traits in the three groups. Box and whisker plots of high-mannose glycans (a), hybrid glycans (b), bisecting glycans (c), biantennary glycans (d), triantennary glycans (e), tetra-antennary glycans (f), fucosylation glycans (g), α2,3 sialic acid glycans (h), α2,6 sialic acid glycans (i), Lewis glycans (k), complex glycans (l), and multibranched glycans (m). The difference between traits was compared using an unpaired Student's t test. The p value was considered significant if it was below 0.05. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. “ns.” indicates no significant difference, p > 0.05. Without: patients were not treated with AIT; Time 1: patients were treated with AIT and had just entered the maintenance phase; Time 2: patients were treated with AIT and had been in the maintenance phase for 1 year

Back to article page